In an ideal world, I think genres shouldn’t exist. Here’s why…
First, genres are just boxes that we shouldn’t try to put music in, like I did with my earlier music.
But secondly, genres are not descriptive. In some cases, they confuse things more than help.
For example, saying a band is a “Folk” band doesn’t tell me anything. That could be Fleet Foxes or Bob Dylan or Edward Sharpe & The Magnetic Zeros.
All very different sounds.
“Rock” music could be Queen or Arcade Fire. “Rap” could be Kanye or John Reuben.
And what the heck is “Alternative”? That tells me nothing about the sonic properties of the music.
I know genres are helpful for finding music that could sound a certain way because they’re one-word categories that give people a very general idea of the music. I’ll give them that.
But when describing your music, don’t just say “Punk rock” or “Folk.”
Instead, I have another idea.
We musicians could say things like “Coldplay is a mini-me of U2” or “Allen Stone is when you combine the voice of Stevie Wonder, the soul of Bill Withers, and the perspective of a grownup millennial.”
Like, this is how I’d probably describe my upcoming album: “It’s like if Coldplay and Bill Withers taught Ben Kweller how to make music and then 21 Pilots popped into the room, turned some knobs and flipped some switches.”
I think that gives people a much more descriptive idea of what they’re about to hear.
So I guess my point is, don’t think of your music as “this” or “that” genre.
Think outside the boxes. Use descriptions and words that give people a clear idea of what your music sounds like.